{"id":584,"date":"2018-07-17T15:06:25","date_gmt":"2018-07-17T06:06:25","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kuis.kandagaigo.ac.jp\/rilae\/?p=584"},"modified":"2018-07-18T09:43:37","modified_gmt":"2018-07-18T00:43:37","slug":"the-self-directed-learning-readiness-scale","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kuis.kandagaigo.ac.jp\/rilae\/the-self-directed-learning-readiness-scale\/","title":{"rendered":"The Self-Directed Learning Readiness Scale"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><b>Purpose:\u00a0<span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">To measure the complex of attitudes, abilities, and characteristics that comprise readiness to engage in self-directed learning.<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Source:\u00a0<\/b><a href=\"http:\/\/www.lpasdlrs.com\/\">http:\/\/www.lpasdlrs.com\/<\/a><\/p>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<p><b>Short description:\u00a0<span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The SDLRS was first published in 1978 by Guglielmino. It is a 58 item, five point Likert scale instrument that measures a total score for self-directed learning readiness. Delahaye and Choy (2000) confirm the internal consistency and test-retest reliability values, as well as content, construct and criterion-related validity. Guglielmino (1978) identified eleven characteristics of self-directed learners including initiative, independence, persistence, responsibility, self-discipline, curiosity, desire (to learn or change), basic skills (study and organizational), pacing\/completion, joy of learning, and goal orientation.<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Sample questions:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Instructions:<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> This is a questionnaire designed to gather data on learning preferences and attitudes towards learning. After reading each item, please indicate the degree to which you feel that statement is true of you. There are no right or wrong answers. Please read each choice carefully and choose the response which best expresses your feeling.<\/span><b><\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">There is no time limit for the questionnaire. Try not to spend too much time on any one item; however, your first reaction to the question will usually be the most accurate.<\/span><b><\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Responses<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>1 = Almost never true of me; I hardly ever feel this way.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>2 = Not often true of me; I feel this way less than half the time.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>3 = Sometimes true of me; I feel this way about half the time.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>4 = Usually true of me; I feel this way more than half the time.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>5 = Almost always true of me; there are very few times when I don&#8217;t feel this way.<\/b><b><\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Sample questions: <\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">I\u2019m looking forward to learning as long as I\u2019m living.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">I know what I want to learn. <\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">I love to learn. <\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><b>Paid or free:\u00a0<\/b>Free<\/p>\n<p><b>Reliability\/validity measures:\u00a0<\/b><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Based on a population of 3,151 individuals from the United States and Canada, a split-half Pearson product moment correlation with a Spearman-Brown correction produced a reliability coefficient of .94 (Guglielmino &amp; Guglielmino, 1991). Most published studies on populations over twenty years old report similar reliability figures that fall within a range of .72 &#8211; .96. In addition to internal reliability estimates, Finestone (1984) and Wiley (1981) reported test-retest reliability coefficients of .82 and .79 respectively. <\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Although there have been some criticisms of the <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">SDLRS<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, (Brockett, 1987; Field, 1989; Straka &amp; Hinz, 1996), the vast majority of studies have supported the reliability and validity of the instrument (see, for example, Delahaye &amp; Smith, 1995; Durr, 1992; Finestone, 1984; Graeve, 1987; Hassan, 1982; Long &amp; Agyekum, 1984; McCune &amp; Guglielmino, 1991; Posner, 1989; Russell, 1988). The <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">SDLRS<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> and its self-scoring form, the <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Learning Preference Assessment<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, are the most frequently used instruments for assessing self-directed learning readiness (Merriam &amp; Caffarella, 1999; Merriam, Caffarella, &amp; Baumgartner, 2007).<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The most recent comprehensive review of the <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">SDLRS\/LPA<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> by Delahaye and Choy examined content, construct and criterion-related validity as well as its reliability (both internal consistency and test-retest). They note that &#8220;there has been extensive support for the <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">LPA<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> in the literature as an accurate and useful instrument for measuring readiness for self-directed learning.&#8221; Addressing some criticism and minor concerns, they conclude: &#8220;While bearing some cautions in mind, the <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">LPA<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> can be used with acceptable confidence to provide an accurate measurement of readiness for self-directed learning.&#8221;<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Citation: Delahaye, B. &amp; Choy, S. (2000). The <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Learning Preference Assessment (Self-Directed Learning Readiness Scale)<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">. In Maltby, J., Lewis, C. A., &amp; Hill, A. (2000). <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Commissioned reviews of 250 psychological tests.<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Edwin Mellen Press, Wales, U.K.<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Setting:\u00a0<\/b><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Educational<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Individual <\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><b>Stakeholder(s):<\/b><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Students<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Instructors<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Individuals <\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><b>Type of measurement:\u00a0<\/b>Questionnaire<\/p>\n<p><b>Possible uses:\u00a0<span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Individual and educational growth <\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Ease of implementation:\u00a0<span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Easy. 58 items, est. 15 min. <\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Advantages:<\/b><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Available in Spanish (Castilian, Columbian, and Cuban), French, German, Italian, Korean, Malay, Chinese, Japanese, Finnish, Greek, Portuguese, Afrikaans, Russian, Latvian, Lithuanian, Farsi, Dutch, Polish and Turkish.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Quantitative.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Provides information on how to interpret your score. \u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">No time limit. <\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><b>Drawbacks:\u00a0<\/b>Self-report<\/p>\n<p><b>Studies this has been used in:\u00a0<span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">List is extremely lengthy. See the bottom of the selfdeterminationtheory.org link for a full list of studies which utilize this instrument.<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Purpose:\u00a0To measure the complex of attitudes, abilities, and characteristics that comprise readiness to engage in self-directed learning. Source:\u00a0http:\/\/www.lpasdlrs.com\/<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[14,13,4,3,7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-584","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-attitudes","category-competence","category-questionnaire","category-self-determination-theory","category-self-regulation"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kuis.kandagaigo.ac.jp\/rilae\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/584","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kuis.kandagaigo.ac.jp\/rilae\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kuis.kandagaigo.ac.jp\/rilae\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kuis.kandagaigo.ac.jp\/rilae\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kuis.kandagaigo.ac.jp\/rilae\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=584"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/kuis.kandagaigo.ac.jp\/rilae\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/584\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":640,"href":"https:\/\/kuis.kandagaigo.ac.jp\/rilae\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/584\/revisions\/640"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kuis.kandagaigo.ac.jp\/rilae\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=584"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kuis.kandagaigo.ac.jp\/rilae\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=584"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kuis.kandagaigo.ac.jp\/rilae\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=584"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}