ADHD, Executive Dysfunction, and Inclusive Instruction: A Pedagogical Perspective from Japan

Robert Dykes, Sojo University, Japan

Abstract

This paper examines Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) as both a neurological difference and an issue of educational access in the Japanese context. It argues that ADHD is likely substantially underdiagnosed in Japan, creating a gap between learner needs and formal institutional support. Drawing on the author’s lived experience with ADHD, the paper examines how executive dysfunction, emotional regulation, and task paralysis affect learning experiences. It then translates everyday coping strategies into practical classroom approaches that teachers may adapt to support executive functioning, including body doubling, gamification and rewards, goal setting, task on-ramps, and the use of generative AI chatbots as process-level scaffolds. Examples illustrate how these strategies can reduce task ambiguity and support writing, planning, and re-engagement after interruption. The paper concludes that inclusive design should not depend on diagnosis, but should instead provide proactive support for diverse executive profiles in order to create more accessible learning environments.

Keywords: ADHD, executive function support, inclusive pedagogy, generative AI scaffolding, classroom strategies

Estimates vary widely, but many studies suggest approximately 15 to 20% of the world population can be characterized as neurodivergent, which includes conditions such as Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), autism spectrum disorder, dyslexia, and dyspraxia (in Doyle, 2020, among others). At a global population of roughly eight billion, this corresponds to approximately 1.2 to 1.6 billion people (Neurodiversity Directory, 2026). These figures encompass both diagnosed and undiagnosed individuals and reflect the substantial underdiagnosis that persists across regions and age groups. Among neurodevelopmental conditions, ADHD is one of the most prevalent. For readers seeking an accessible, practitioner-oriented overview of ADHD, ADHD 2.0 offers a clear synthesis of current research and its implications for everyday learning and work (Hallowell & Ratey, 2022).

Given the scale of neurodiversity worldwide and the likelihood of underrecognition in educational settings, it becomes important to consider how classrooms can better support executive functioning differences. This paper examines ADHD as both a neurological difference and an issue of educational access, with particular attention to the Japanese context, where diagnosis and institutional support may remain comparatively limited.

 This paper is organized into four sections. First, it outlines the teaching context in Japan and highlights the gap between ADHD prevalence and formal support. It then draws on the author’s lived experience with ADHD to frame everyday executive function coping strategies as potential pedagogical tools. The third section presents practical classroom applications, illustrating how these strategies may be adapted to reduce task ambiguity and support student engagement. The paper concludes with reflections and some implications for inclusive instruction, particularly in contexts where diagnosis and institutional support remain limited.

This paper does not report on a formal classroom intervention. Rather, it draws on the author’s lived experience with ADHD and translates everyday executive function coping strategies into potential classroom practices that teachers may adapt to their own contexts. Understanding ADHD-related executive dysfunction is important for educators because it can help explain patterns of task difficulty and inform more accessible classroom design.

In this paper, executive functions refer to the cognitive processes that help learners plan, organize, begin tasks, regulate attention and emotion, shift between steps, and monitor progress. Executive dysfunction refers to difficulty using these processes consistently, especially when tasks are complex, ambiguous, emotionally stressful, or require sustained attention.

Teaching Context in Japan

ADHD prevalence estimates vary depending on diagnostic criteria and reporting methodology. At the broadest level, the World Health Organization (2019) places the worldwide average between 5% and 8%. By contrast, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2024) report that over 11% of children aged between five and 17 in the US have beenclinically diagnosed with ADHD, rather than merely estimated to have the condition. Similarly, the UK’s National Health Service reports that approximately 5% of children and 3% to 4% of adults have ADHD (Russell et al., 2024). At the lower end of international estimates, the ADHD World Federation suggests a prevalence of 2.8% (Rohde et al., 2019), whilethe Attention Deficit Disorder Association (n.d.) reports a broader international range of 2.8% to 6.7%.

When examining Japan, an even starker disparity emerges. Epidemiological research suggests that only approximately 1.65% of adults are diagnosed with ADHD (Kato et al., 2023; Naya et al., 2021), a figure substantially lower than even the lowest international prevalence estimates (2.8% for adults). Naya et al. (2021) report that survey-based studies using validated screening tools further indicate that a meaningful proportion of adults without a formal diagnosis nonetheless exhibit symptom profiles consistent with ADHD.

Data from the Japan Student Services Organization (JASSO) further suggest that ADHD may be particularly underrecognized within higher education. In 2024, only 3,948 out of 3.2 million students in higher education were classified specifically under 注意欠如・多動症 (ADHD, in Japanese), representing approximately 0.12% of the student population. The broader 発達障害 (developmental disorder, in Japanese) category included 11,923 students, or approximately 0.37% of the student population, but this category also includes autism spectrum disorder, specific learning disorders, developmental disorder overlap, and other developmental disorders (JASSO, 2025).

Overall, this body of research strongly suggests that a substantial proportion of people in Japan may remain undiagnosed, and that only a subset of those who meet diagnostic criteria receive pharmacological or behavioral treatment. Although recent research indicates that ADHD diagnoses in Japan have increased in recent years (Burke et al, 2024; JASSO, 2025; Sasayama et al., 2022), the available evidence still points to substantial gaps in recognition, diagnosis, and support.

Research on ADHD-related stigma in Japan further suggests that ADHD traits may be interpreted as character flaws or lack of effort, potentially inhibiting help-seeking and support (Maeda et al., 2026). Naya et al. (2021) note that a substantial proportion of undiagnosed and untreated ADHD has been suggested in Japan, while Kato et al. (2023) report findings consistent with possible underdiagnosis of adult ADHD, particularly when ADHD traits are obscured by mood disorder symptoms. Taken together, these findings support the inference that many students and adults with ADHD-related impairment in Japan may remain outside formal diagnostic or institutional support systems.

For this reason, awareness, education, and pedagogical accommodation for ADHD seem particularly important in the Japanese context. This gap underscores the importance of educational and institutional responses that do not rely solely on formal diagnosis, but instead emphasize inclusive design, executive function support, and stigma-reducing approaches within educational environments.

From ADHD Experience to Pedagogical Strategy

Neurocognitive foundations of ADHD

Beyond social and institutional factors, neurocognitive research also helps explain why ADHD often requires different forms of pedagogical support. ADHD is multifactorial, functional differences between the Default Mode Network (DMN) and the Task-Positive Network (TPN) have been consistently implicated in attentional control and regulation (Mills et al., 2018). The DMN is associated with internally oriented mental activity, such as mind-wandering, imagination, and autobiographical memory, while the TPN is associated with externally oriented, attention-demanding tasks. In simplified terms, these networks often work in a reciprocal pattern: when one becomes more active, the other is typically reduced. In ADHD, however, research suggests that this separation may be less consistent, allowing internally oriented thought to intrude more easily during task-focused activity (Mills et al., 2018). For students, this can feel like trying to focus while the mind repeatedly drifts, interrupts, or pulls attention elsewhere. To use a classroom-friendly metaphor, the boundary between these two systems may function less like a closed door and more like an old western saloon door: not permanently open, but easier to swing through than expected.

Although neurocognitive research provides useful insight into attentional regulation, ADHD should not be reduced to a single, straightforward neurological mechanism. ADHD is multifactorial and heterogeneous, with considerable variation in symptom presentation, comorbidities, neurocognitive profiles, developmental trajectories, and functional impairment (Luo et al., 2019). Presentation may also differ across gender lines, with research suggesting that ADHD in girls and women is often less recognized or referred because symptoms may be internalized, minimized, or masked (Young et al., 2020).

Consequently, there is no one size fits all solution, such as “more freedom” or “more structure” for an ADHD student. However, there are many tools that educators can use as low-effort classroom communication strategies and response techniques that can be used with any student who may need a little extra task support. The main goal is to reframe ADHD not as a lack of willpower, but as a neurological difference that benefits from informed support, understanding, and empathy.

To better understand why such support may be necessary, the following section examines executive dysfunction and emotional regulation in ADHD. This helps explain why many learners experience task paralysis, difficulty initiating tasks, and challenges sustaining engagement even when they understand what needs to be done.

To clarify what effective support requires, the following sub-section examines neurocognitive research on ADHD. This helps explain why many ADHD learners experience task paralysis and executive dysfunction.

Executive dysfunction and emotion

ADHD is often characterized as a disorder of attention or hyperactivity; however, these observable behaviors reflect underlying differences in executive functioning, the cognitive system responsible for planning, emotional regulation, and attentional control. As the ADHD nervous system reacts to stress and emotion more rapidly and intensely, responses may appear disproportionate or difficult to regulate (Barkley & Fischer, 2010).

Emotion is not a side effect; it is central to ADHD, reflecting core difficulties in emotional self-regulation rather than secondary behavioral consequences (Barkley, 2004). People with ADHD often experience many emotional struggles such as frustration, task shame, rejection sensitivity, anxiety, and decision fatigue (Martel et al., 2011). At the same time, they may also commonly possess many emotional strengths: passion, empathy, creativity, and humor (Hallowell & Ratey, 2022).

For many individuals, one of the most significant challenges associated with ADHD is executive dysfunction, or knowing what to do but being unable to begin or sustain action. Sometimes referred to as “ADHD paralysis” or “ADHD shutdown,” this experience often emerges when a task feels overwhelming, emotionally loaded, or difficult to organize into manageable steps. The result may be avoidance accompanied by feelings such as shame, frustration, anxiety, or decision fatigue. These emotions can then intensify avoidance, creating a difficult cycle to interrupt (Barkley, 2004; Martel et al., 2011).

Practical Classroom Applications

The strategies outlined in this section draw on the theoretical and experiential insights discussed above and translate them into practical classroom applications. Rather than prescriptive solutions, they are presented as flexible approaches that teachers can adapt to their own contexts. The examples that follow illustrate how these strategies may be integrated into common classroom tasks, particularly those involving writing, planning, or sustained attention. Developing an understanding of ADHD, alongside an empathetic stance, can inform more responsive teaching practices. In this regard, teachers might consider approaches such as body doubling, gamification and rewards, and goal setting and task on-ramps (Eagle et al., 2024; Prevatt, 2016), as well as the use of generative AI chatbots to scaffold tasks or help students move through periods of executive difficulty. The following sub-sections describe each strategy and its intended use, along with examples of how they can be implemented in specific assignments.

Body doubling

Body doubling is a curious strategy in that it evolved as a community-driven phenomenon (Eagle et al., 2024) rather than as a formally established clinical or pedagogical intervention. In the simplest terms, this approach involves working in the presence of others to cultivate a sense of soft accountability. It is important to differentiate this from “co-working,” as the activity being carried out does not need to be the same. This form of shared-presence support naturally occurs in many environments, and many people with ADHD may benefit from its effects without explicitly identifying it. Naming this phenomenon and intentionally creating opportunities for such shared work contexts may support neurodivergent and ADHD students with task initiation and completion. This strategy is often video-mediated, and several platforms have been developed, such as FocusMate, StudyTogether, and StudyStream (cited in Eagle et al., 2024), but it can also be implemented with a family member, friend, or classmate through video conferencing tools such as Zoom, Teams, Messenger, or Line video.

Despite these potential benefits, body doubling is not universally effective. Some individuals, including the author, experience increased distraction or discomfort in the presence of others and therefore often work more productively in solitary environments. This suggests that it should be understood as one potentially helpful option rather than a prescriptive or universally applicable strategy. For some learners, it may facilitate task initiation and persistence; for others, alternative forms of structure may be more beneficial.

Gamification and rewards

Game-based approaches and reward systems can work for learners of all ages, though care is needed to avoid infantilizing tasks for older students. One reason these approaches may be effective for some learners with ADHD relates to differences in dopamine regulation (Dovis et al., 2015). More specifically, ADHD has been associated with altered reinforcement sensitivity, including stronger effects of immediate reinforcement and reduced effectiveness of delayed rewards (Luman et al., 2005; Luman et al., 2010). In educational contexts, this suggests that rewards may be most useful when they are immediate, specific, and clearly connected to the target behavior or task step.

For this reason, “reward” should not be understood only as prizes, points, or badges, but also as timely feedback, visible progress, teacher recognition, or short-term completion signals that help sustain motivation. Simple forms of task completion, such as checking items off a list, can provide small but meaningful reinforcement that supports motivation and persistence. More elaborate forms of game-inspired structuring operate on a similar principle by organizing work around clear goals, feedback, and incremental achievement. However, the effectiveness of such approaches is likely to vary by individual and developmental stage. In childhood, structured reading contests and similar programs may be highly motivating. In adulthood, by contrast, some learners may find that highly game-oriented learning environments do not consistently lead to deep or sustained outcomes, even if they are subjectively enjoyable. This underscores the need for flexible, context-sensitive approaches rather than one-size-fits-all solutions.

Importantly, rewards in educational contexts need not be material or game-based. For many students, particularly those with ADHD, meaningful teacher engagement can function as a powerful form of reward (Ryan & Deci, 2023). For example, when assigning a 1,000-word essay, an instructor might either provide brief corrective feedback or, alternatively, offer a more substantive personal response that demonstrates genuine interest in the student’s ideas and experiences. In the latter case, the teacher’s attention and recognition can serve as a primary motivator, often carrying more weight than numerical grades alone. This suggests that game-based design principles should be understood broadly to include relational and communicative forms of reward, not only digital games or point systems.

Although the following example does not come directly from the author’s personal ADHD coping strategies, educators can also draw on actual games as structured learning environments. In Japan, James York has been a prominent figure in advancing game-based language learning, including work with Minecraft for online collaboration and tabletop games for classroom interaction. He is also the creator of Ludic Language Pedagogy, a non-profit initiative that seeks “to bring together people and promote conversations around how best to integrate games and play into language teaching and learning” (Ludic Language Pedagogy, 2021, para 1).

Goal setting and task on-ramps: Externalizing executive functions

Some additional strategies, goal setting and task on-ramps, can be understood as practical forms of externalizing executive functions, that is, shifting part of the mental work of planning, sequencing, and decision-making out of the student’s head and into the structure of the task itself (Kirschner et al., 2006). In this paper, I treat these approaches not as separate strategies but as overlapping ways of lowering executive demand and making action easier to start.

For students with ADHD, goal setting is not simply a matter of articulating desired outcomes, but of providing goals that generate rapid feedback and reduce ambiguity (Prevatt, 2016). ADHD learners often struggle less with effort than with translating abstract goals into immediate action (Barkley, 2004). Although goal setting and task on-ramps can be used together, they are not dependent on one another.  Task on-ramps  are low-friction entry points that make it easier to begin a task without becoming overwhelmed by its scope. These are low-friction initial actions that help bypass executive resistance and reduce the emotional load associated with task initiation (Barkley & Fischer, 2010).

The contrast below illustrates how reducing executive load can change the accessibility of the same assignment.
Traditional writing assignment: Write a one-page essay about your summer vacation. Describe where you went and what you did. Submit by the end of class.

Executive function-supported framing of the same assignment:
Step 1 (10 minutes): open a new writing document and answer the following questions

– Where did you go this summer break?
– Who were you with this summer break?
– What was one memorable moment during the summer break?

Step 2 (10 minutes): expand each of your answers to 3 or 4 sentences. Do not worry about grammar or spelling.

Step 3 (15 minutes): Choose one expanded answer and revise it into a short paragraph (approximately 120–150 words). You may leave the other sections as notes.

Goal: Complete Steps 1 and 2 in class. Step 3 may be finished at home if needed.

In the executive function supported framing version, the assignment itself carries much of the executive load: the teacher supplies clear goals, breaks the task into manageable steps, and provides a low-friction starting point that reduces initial overwhelm. The content of the assignment remains the same, but by externalizing planning and sequencing into the task structure, the design lowers cognitive barriers to initiation and makes sustained engagement more feasible, particularly for learners prone to executive shutdown.

Generative AI chatbot support for executive function support

The innovative contribution of this paper lies not in any single technique, but in the integration of everyday coping mechanics with generative AI as a process-level support for executive functioning. Rather than positioning generative AI primarily around output production, academic misuse, cheating, or assessment redesign, as much early educational discussion has done (Ohashi & Hubbard, 2025), the approach presented here frames AI as a metacognitive tool that helps students clarify task demands, identify manageable next steps, and recover attention after interruption. This combination of inclusive task design and accessible AI scaffolding is intended to be practical for ordinary teachers, scalable across disciplines, and beneficial to both diagnosed and undiagnosed learners who struggle with executive demands or task paralysis.

Building on the strategies outlined above, this sub-section examines how generative AI, particularly chatbot-based tools, can function as a process-level scaffold for executive functioning. It may be easier to think of the generative AI in these examples as a type of learning coach, and in that way, the reader may find it easier to conceptualize more varied prompts that may assist students. The prompt examples that follow are grounded in the author’s own experience using generative AI to manage ADHD-related executive demands and have been adapted from personal real-world use cases to make them more broadly applicable for students in higher education.

The prompt examples that follow are grounded in the author’s own experience using generative AI to manage ADHD-related executive demands and have been adapted from personal real-world use cases to make them more broadly applicable for students in higher education.

Traditional writing assignment: Write a 1,000-word reflective essay discussing how the course themes relate to your own learning experience. Use at least two readings from the syllabus.

For many learners, this instruction can feel opaque, overwhelming, and difficult to translate into concrete action. Generative AI can be used not to write the essay, but as a cognitive scaffold that helps learners clarify the task, organize their thinking, and re-enter work when they become stuck. Before students use generative AI independently, teachers may need to model the intended use in class. For example, the teacher could demonstrate one prompt at the beginning of a writing assignment and clearly distinguish between using AI to clarify, organize, or sequence a task and using it to generate the assignment itself. Students could then practice with the same prompt before applying it to their own work.

Task clarification and sequencing. A simple, intuitive prompt to a generative AI system might be:

I have this assignment: “Write a 1,000-word reflective essay discussing how the course themes relate to my own learning experience, using at least two readings.” Can you explain what this task is asking me to do, break it into clear steps, and suggest a basic structure for the essay?

It is important to note that, when used this way, generative AI functions as a cognitive scaffold and not a content generator.

Externalizing ideas without generating content. Real-time idea externalization and attention recovery are two more areas that generative AI may be able to assist in, however these areas probably need slightly more explicit framing for generative AI to offer effective assistance. The following prompt examples illustrate how this strategy can be applied to the same 1,000-word reflective essay assignment:

(Externalizing thoughts without generating new content)

Prompt example 1 (free-flow externalization): I’m working on this assignment: “Write a 1,000-word reflective essay on how the course themes relate to my learning experience.” I’m going to type my thoughts as they come. Please organize what I write into clear points, but don’t add new ideas.

Prompt example 2 (guided externalization): I have ideas about how my Great Books course changed the way I think about learning, but they feel messy. Can you help me turn my notes into bullet points that I can later expand into paragraphs?

These prompts help learners move thoughts out of working memory and into a structured form, reducing cognitive load and making next steps clearer.

Re-orienting after loss of focus or interruption. Learners with ADHD often struggle when returning to work after a break or interruption. The following tasks may be helpful in getting learners back on task.

Prompt example 3 (re-entry after interruption): I’m writing a reflective essay for this assignment, but I stopped and now feel stuck. Based on what I’ve written so far, can you briefly summarize where I am and suggest one small next step?

Prompt example 4 (task narrowing): I’m overwhelmed by this 1,000-word essay and don’t know what to do next. I have 500 words done and have no idea what to do next. What is the smallest concrete step I could take right now to move forward?

For people without ADHD or who do not struggle with executive dysfunction may not understand that this simple step, “What is the smallest concrete step I could take right now to move forward?” can be all the difference between failing to submit an assignment and successfully completing it. Sometimes, for ADHD, it is simply about breaking out of that executive dysfunction loop.

For many individuals, including the author, the most challenging aspect of ADHD is not inattentiveness per se but recurrent executive dysfunction loops, in which task overwhelm leads to avoidance, which then amplifies negative affect and further inhibits action. For the author, recognizing the onset of these loops has been a critical step in managing ADHD more effectively in recent years. The strategic use of generative AI as a form of cognitive scaffolding has also played a significant role in disrupting such cycles, for example, by helping to clarify tasks, identify manageable next steps, or reorient attention after distraction. This suggests that tools or teacher scaffolding which support metacognition and task decomposition may be particularly valuable for learners prone to executive shutdown.

Reflection and Implications

This paper has outlined how executive function challenges associated with ADHD can inform more inclusive classroom design. The low-effort pedagogical adjustments discussed here have the potential to benefit a wide range of students, not only those formally diagnosed with ADHD. When combined with the thoughtful use of generative AI as a cognitive scaffold, these approaches can lower executive function barriers for learners with ADHD while simultaneously supporting students who may struggle with task initiation, planning, or sustained attention for other reasons.

Although ADHD provides a particularly clear lens through which to understand these challenges, difficulties such as task paralysis are not unique to ADHD. Viewing them from this perspective can therefore help educators design learning environments that are more inclusive and supportive for all students. It is also important to recognize that ADHD and related learning differences do notreflect differences in intelligence (American Psychiatric Association, 2022). Rather, they are associated with challenges in self-regulation, information processing, expression, and sustained attention.

Empathy is the first step in helping lower the barriers for many of these students, and before empathy, we must understand that these issues exist and how they manifest in our learning environments. If the reader wants to focus solely on ADHD, ADHD 2.0 is probably the most accessible and relevant publication on the subject currently available. Evidence suggests that, relative to many Western countries, Japan continues to lag in the development and implementation of inclusive education policies for students with specific learning difficulties and neurodiverse conditions (Young, 2024).

For teachers, the practical implication is that ADHD-informed support does not require a separate curriculum or highly specialized intervention. Instead, educators can reduce task ambiguity by clearly structuring assignments, expectations, and stages of completion. They can also provide low-friction entry points, or task on-ramps, that make it easier for students to begin work before overwhelm sets in.

More broadly, teachers can externalize planning and sequencing rather than assuming that all students can manage these processes internally. When students struggle to begin, continue, or return to a task, this difficulty should not automatically be interpreted as a lack of effort or motivation; it may reflect executive function barriers. Used thoughtfully, classroom design, teacher feedback, and tools such as generative AI can function as scaffolds for planning, organization, and re-engagement, supporting students’ learning processes rather than replacing their own work.

Notes on the contributor

Robert Dykes is a senior lecturer at Sojo University, where he teaches English communication and film studies. He has twice received the Michael Steele Best of JALT Award and has chaired multiple international ELT conferences. He is the originator and co-editor of two Candlin & Mynard volumes on artificial intelligence and language learning.

References

American Psychiatric Association. (2022). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. American Psychiatric Association Publishing eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425787

Attention Deficit Disorder Association. (n.d.). ADHD facts. ADDA. https://www.add.org/adhd-facts/

Barkley, R. A. (2004). Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and self-regulation: Taking an evolutionary perspective on executive functioning. In R. F. Baumeister, & K. D. Vohs (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and applications (pp. 301–323). The Guilford Press. https://lccn.loc.gov/2003020013

Barkley, R. A., & Fischer, M. (2010). The unique contribution of emotional impulsiveness to impairment in major life activities in hyperactive children as adults. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 49(5), 503–513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2010.01.019

Burke, A. (2024).Barrier-free classrooms: The road to change and ideas for your classes. Mind, Brain, and Education SIG, 10(10), 48–60. 

Burke, A., Young, D., & Cook, M. L. (2024). Barrier-free instruction in Japan: Recommendations for teachers at all levels of schooling. Candlin & Mynard.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2024, November 19). Data and statistics on ADHD. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. https://www.cdc.gov/adhd/data/index.html

Dovis, S., Van der Oord, S., Wiers, R. W., & Prins, P. J. M. (2015). Improving executive functioning in children with ADHD: Training multiple executive functions within the context of a computer game. A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial. PLOS ONE, 10(4), e0121651. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121651

Doyle, N. (2020). Neurodiversity at work: A biopsychosocial model and the impact on working adults. British Medical Bulletin, 135(1), 108–125. https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldaa021

Eagle, T., Baltaxe-Admony, L. B., & Ringland, K. E. (2024). “It was something I naturally found worked and heard about later”: An investigation of body doubling with neurodivergent participants. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing, 17(3), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1145/3689648

Hallowell, E. M., & Ratey, J. J. (2022). ADHD 2.0: New science and essential strategies for thriving with distraction–From childhood through adulthood. Ballantine Books.

Japan Student Services Organization. (2025). 令和6年度（2024年度） 大学、短期大学及び高等専門学校における障害のある学生の修学支援に関する実態調査結果報告書 [Report on the 2024 survey of support for students with disabilities in universities, junior colleges, and colleges of technology] https://www.jasso.go.jp/statistics/gakusei_shogai_syugaku/__icsFiles/afieldfile/2025/10/27/2024_houkoku_2.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com

Kato, M., Tsuda, H., Chen, Y., Tsuji, T., & Nishigaki, N. (2023). The burden of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder traits in adult patients with major depressive disorder in Japan. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, 19, 1055–1067. https://doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S399915

Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experimental, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1

Ludic Language Pedagogy. (2021). About LLP. https://llpjournal.org/2018/01/01/llp-mission.html

Luman, M., Oosterlaan, J., & Sergeant, J. A. (2005). The impact of reinforcement contingencies on AD/HD: A review and theoretical appraisal. Clinical Psychology Review, 25(2), 183–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2004.11.001

Luman, M., Tripp, G., & Scheres, A. (2010). Identifying the neurobiology of altered reinforcement sensitivity in ADHD: A review and research agenda. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 34(5), 744–754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.11.021

Luo, Y., Weibman, D., Halperin, J. M., & Li, X. (2019). A review of heterogeneity in attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 13, Article 42. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2019.00042

Maeda, C., Knouse, L. E., Takeda, K., Masudomi, C., Takahashi, E., Katsuragawa, T., & Kumano, H. (2026). A narrative review of stigma and masking in ADHD: Insights from English-language research and the Japanese cultural context. Frontiers in Psychology, 17, Article 1807337. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1807337

Martel, M. M., Roberts, B., Gremillion, M., von Eye, A., & Nigg, J. T. (2011). External validation of a bifactor model of ADHD: Explaining heterogeneity in psychiatric comorbidity, cognitive control, and personality trait profiles within DSM-IV ADHD. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 39(8), 1111–1123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-011-9538-y

Mills, B. D., Miranda-Dominguez, O., Mills, K. L., Earl, E., Cordova, M., Painter, J., Karalunas, S. L, Nigg, J. T., & Fair, D. A. (2018). ADHD and attentional control: Impaired segregation of task-positive and task-negative brain networks. Network neuroscience, 2(2), 200–217.https://doi.org/10.1162/netn_a_00034

Naya, Tsuji, T., Nishigaki, N., Sakai, C., Chen, Y., Jung, S., & Kosaka, H. (2021). The burden of undiagnosed adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder symptoms in Japan: A cross-sectional study. Cureus, 13(11), e19615. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.19615

Neurodiversity Directory. (2026). Neurodiversity statistics and research data. https://neurodiversity.directory/neurodiversity-statistics/

Ohashi, L., & Hubbard, P. (2025). Generative AI ethics: Emerging principles for language teachers. In L. Ohashi, M. Hillis, & R. Dykes (Eds.), Artificial intelligence in our language learning classrooms (pp. 100–122). Candlin & Mynard ePublishing. https://doi.org/10.47908/38

Prevatt, F. (2016). Coaching for college students with ADHD. Current Psychiatry Reports, 18(12), 110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-016-0751-9

Rohde, L. A., Buitelaar, J. K., Gerlach, M., & Faraone, S. V. (2019). The world federation of ADHD guide. World Federation of ADHD. https://www.adhd-federation.org/_Resources/Persistent/6d9ca34c09972aea00d0ea6d02be6f6d6bd5bb4c/The%20WF%20ADHD%20Guide_072019.pdf

Russell, S., Hinwood, C., & Fuller, C. (2024, March 28). Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) programme update. NHS England. https://www.england.nhs.uk/long-read/attention-deficit-hyperactivity-disorder-adhd-programme-update/

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2023). Self-determination theory. In Maggino, F. (Ed.) Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research (pp. 6229–6235). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17299-1_2630

Sasayama, D., Kuge, R., Toibana, Y., & Honda, H. (2022). Trends in diagnosed attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder among children, adolescents, and adults in Japan from April 2010 to March 2020. JAMA network open, 5(9), e2234179. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.34179

World Health Organization. (2019). Attention deficit hyperactive disorder (ADHD) fact sheet [PDF]. WHO. https://iris.who.int/server/api/core/bitstreams/124a9607-3e2f-423c-aef0-2f79407971ad/content

Young, D. (2024). The emergence and development of inclusive education in Japan: Local to global and back again. In A. Burke, D., Young, & M. L. Cook (Eds.), Barrier-free Instruction in Japan: Recommendations for teachers at all levels of schooling (pp. 22–64). Candlin & Mynard. https://doi.org/10.47908/30/1

Young, S., Adamo, N., Ásgeirsdóttir, B. B. et al., (2020). Females with ADHD: An expert consensus statement taking a lifespan approach providing guidance for the identification and treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in girls and women. BMC Psychiatry, 20, Article 404. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-020-02707-9